Meir’s responsa and also in their content from a beneficial responsum of the Roentgen
Rabbi Meir b. Baruch off Rothenburg (Maharam, c.1215–1293) writes you to “An excellent Jew need prize his wife more the guy remembers themselves. If one affects your wife, one should end up being punished a whole lot more seriously than for hitting another person. For just one are enjoined so you can honor one’s spouse it is maybe not enjoined so you can prize each other. . When the the guy lasts when you look at the striking their particular, he are excommunicated, lashed, and suffer the severest punishments, even to your the quantity out-of amputating their case. In the event that his partner is actually happy to take on brightwomen.net katso nГ¤mГ¤ ylГ¶s a divorce, the guy need to divorce case her and you may shell out their unique new ketubbah” (Actually ha-Ezer #297). He states that a lady that is hit because of the their particular husband are entitled to a direct divorce proceedings also to have the currency owed their own within her relationships payment. Their guidance to chop off of the hand out-of a habitual beater off his fellow echoes legislation inside the Deut. –a dozen, where uncommon abuse out of cutting off a give try used to help you a female which attempts to help save their own spouse during the good way that shames the new beater.
So you’re able to validate their view, R. Meir spends biblical and you may talmudic thing so you can legitimize their feedback. After so it responsum the guy talks about the new court precedents for this decision regarding the Talmud (B. Gittin 88b). Therefore he ends up one to “despite the actual situation in which she are prepared to accept [occasional beatings], she you should never take on beatings in the place of a finish around the corner.” The guy what to the fact that a fist gets the possible to help you kill and therefore in the event that peace is hopeless, the fresh rabbis need in order to persuade your in order to divorce or separation their unique from “his or her own totally free often,” however, if one proves hopeless, force him to help you divorce proceedings their unique (as is desired for legal reasons [ka-torah]).
This responsum is found in a collection of R. Simhah b. Samuel of Speyer (d. 1225–1230). By freely copying it in its entirety, it is clear that R. Meir endorses R. Simhah’s opinions. R. Simhah, using an aggadic approach, wrote that a man has to honor his wife more than himself and that is why his wife-and not his fellow man-should be his greater concern. R. Simhah stresses her status as wife rather than simply as another individual. His argument is that, like Eve, “the mother of all living” (Gen. 3:20), she was given for living, not for suffering. She trusts him and thus it is worse if he hits her than if he hits a stranger.
But not, they were overturned of the most rabbis into the after years, you start with Roentgen
R. Simhah lists all the possible sanctions. If these are of no avail, he takes the daring leap and not only allows a compelled divorce but allows one that is forced on the husband by gentile authorities. It is rare that rabbis tolerate forcing a man to divorce his wife and it is even rarer that they suggested that the non-Jewish community adjudicate their internal affairs. He is one of the few rabbis who authorized a compelled divorce as a sanction. Many Ashkenazi rabbis quote his opinions with approval. Israel b. Petahiah Isserlein (1390–1460) and R. David b. Solomon Ibn Abi Zimra (Radbaz, 1479–1573). In his responsum, Radbaz wrote that Simhah “exaggerated on the measures to be taken when writing that [the wifebeater] should be forced by non-Jews (akum) to divorce his wife . because [if she remarries] this could result in the offspring [of the illegal marriage, according to Radbaz] being declared illegitimate ( Lit. «bastard.» Offspring of a relationship forbidden in the Torah, e.g., between a married woman and a man other than her husband or by incest. mamzer )” (part 4, 157).
- postimyynti morsiamen tarinoita
- 27 de enero de 2024